What Is A Shadow Director?

Legal Service Provider In Malaysia For Corporate Law, Legal Advice, Legal Assistance, Commercial Litigation And Arbitration

What Is A Shadow Director?

October 6, 2020 Corporate & Commercial Disputes 0

What is a shadow director

A shadow director is a director who: 

  1. Is not formally appointed by the company;
  2. Are usually the ones who are controlling/ commanding the formally appointed directors (de jure directors) in the background; and
  3. The instructions given by them are usually followed and carried out by members of the board of directors of the company. 

In Sazean Engineering & Construction Sdn Bhd v Bumi Bersatu Sdn Bhd, the court described such person as a rather sinister individual who is in actuality a ‘puppeteer’ i.e. he who pulls the strings and his puppets will dance to the music/ tune he played.

 

The law concerning this topic

Question: Is the term shadow director defined under the law?
Answer: No. However, this is rectified by an all-encompassing definition under Section 2 of the Companies Act:

“…“director” includes any person occupying the position of director of a corporation by whatever name called and includes a person in accordance with whose directions or instructions the directors of a corporation are accustomed to act and an alternate or substitute director.”

Question: How does the court determine if a person is a shadow director?
Answer: In the high court case of Peninsular Fibre Industries Sdn Bhd v Tan Yoke Chin, the court noted that to determine if a person is a shadow director of a company, the facts of each case would have to be examined on its own. However, some of the telltale signs (whether a person is a shadow director) are as follow:

  1. There is evidence of a controlling or commanding role exercised by the shadow director over the de jure directors;
  2. The person was responsible for giving directions and instructions in the capacity as the director of the company to the board of directors of the company; 
  3. The directions and instructions had been complied with by the de jure directors of the company; and
  4. The de jure directors did not exercise any discretion or independent judgment but were merely complying with the instructions and or directions of that particular person. 

Question: Does the shadow director owe a fiduciary duty towards the company (in case if things go wrong)?
Answer: Section 196 (4)(b) of the Act stipulates 
that a substitute or an alternate director would not qualify as a director for the purpose of filling in a mandatory vacancy in the event the number of the remaining directors is to dip below the minimum number allowed by law. However, this does not mean that a shadow director can do as he pleases and fancies without any consequences. This was observed in the court of appeal case of Sazean Engineering & Construction Sdn Bhd, where the court noted that:

“But, this informal or de facto and shadow director are treated as a director under the CA 1965 for the purpose of attaching liability on them as, by their conduct, the law attaches on them a fiduciary duty which they owe to the company which they seek to control or ‘orchestrate’.”

Question: Does that mean that a person is barred from giving any advice (at all) to a company (assuming that he does, he might be considered a shadow director)?
Answer:
Not at all. This was confirmed in the high court case of Ravichanthiran a/l Ganesan v Percetakan Wawasan Maju Sdn Bhd & Ors (which adopted the principles laid down in the English case of Re Unisoft Group Limited (No 3)), where the court stated that:

  1. A person is not deemed a shadow director by reason only that the directors on advice given by him in a professional capacity, unless if the board of the company is one person only and that person is a ‘cat’s paw’ for an outsider.  
  2. Unless the whole of the board, or at the very least a governing majority of it is accustomed to act on the directions of an outsider, such an outsider cannot be a shadow director. 
  3. There must be multiple instances where the person has given instructions/ commands to the directors of the company before a person could be even considered to be a shadow director.

 

 

The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice; instead, all information, content, and materials available on this site are for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not constitute the most up-to-date legal or other information. For further inquiries, please email us at general@mathews.my.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *